Workers continue to get fired for not complying with vaccine mandates

While YouTube and other social media networks are focusing on censoring vaccine skepticism on the internet, corporations all over the country are forcing their employees to get vaccinated under the threat of unemployment.

This is the case in the healthcare industry. According to the latest tally by healthcare industry news website Fierce Healthcare, nearly 6,000 healthcare workers had been terminated or had resigned from nearly 50 hospitals and health systems all over the country. Additionally, around 6,600 healthcare workers are currently suspended or have yet to report their vaccination status.

It is expected that hundreds or thousands more healthcare workers will lose their jobs as more hospitals and health systems reach their deadlines for partial or full vaccination.

The assault on Americans who are skeptical of the vaccines from the government and the private sector is relentless.

Of all the aspects of the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Marks wrote that the push to force everyone to get vaccinated “is one of the most troubling, and should cause us to consider its probability, provenance and rectification.”meLearn more about how governments and corporations all over the world are working together to coerce people into getting the deadly COVID-19 vaccines at

Sources include:


Responses across the U.S. from the COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate

On Oct 20, the Police Benevolent Association (PBA), New York City’s largest police union, responded to the COVID-19 vaccine mandate by suing the city for police officers, firefighters, and other municipal workers. The PBA argued that vaccinations are a “personal medical decision”.

On Oct 14, Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt announced that they will take the Biden administration to court over the vaccine mandate. He also stated, President Biden’s administration has no respect for individual freedom and such action is not only federal overreach but also unconstitutional.

We cannot trust or rely on a government which covers up the vaccine induced harms 

and continues to enforce the mandate. It is hoped that more and more justice forces can stand up and fight to stop this vaccine disaster.     


Vaccine mandate being used to gut America’s weapons research assets by firing top scientists at Los Alamos

(Natural News) The diabolical nature of the Biden regime puts America and Americans more at risk every day as these lunatics continue to exploit the COVID-19 pandemic to weaken our country in the face of our enemies, such is their hatred for our liberties.

Nuclear weapons may be one of those things we, as members of the human race, may wish we could un-invent, but they are here now, have been for decades, and they are now a vital part of our national security. But the current regime is hell-bent on destroying even this advantage we hold over our two primary competitors — Russia and China — which have nuclear weapons inventories of their own.

According to multiple reports, literally dozens of employees at the Los Alamos nuclear weapons research and development lab in New Mexico face termination after refusing to get a COVID vaccine, and among those at risk of being fired include some of our country’s top nuclear scientists.

The deadline for all federal workers and federal contractors at the lab to get the vaccine has come and gone and it’s not clear at this point if any of the highly skilled researchers have actually been terminated, but clearly that is a consideration and if we lose those personnel, there isn’t any way to rapidly replace the skill set and the decades of knowledge they collectively obtain.

To that point, 114 employees filed a lawsuit seeking an injunction against the vaccine mandate, which The Hill reported last week, “Workers at the New Mexico laboratory, which created the atomic bomb, filed a lawsuit claiming that exemptions to the mandate have been denied without proper justification.”

However, a state judge has already struck down the suit, KRQE13 reported:

On Friday,  Judge Jason Lidyard denied the request of the 114 employees asking for the vaccine mandate at LANL to be blocked. Jonathan Diener is an attorney representing some of the plaintiffs, who argued to the judge that LANL should be considered a government entity.

“To me, it’s perfectly clear that employment is a benefit that the government is giving these people at LANL and they’re taking it away because they’re exercising their constitutional right to decide what goes in their body,” said Diener.

According to the Los Alamos National Laboratory, workers had until Oct. 15 to be vaccinated. “Employees granted religious exemptions will go on vacation or unpaid leave until pandemic conditions improve. Judge Lidyard said that was an ‘ok’ religious accommodation,” the local outlet reported.

But the plaintiffs’ attorney disagreed.

“That was not a real accommodation and I’m shocked that the judge accepted that as a legitimate accommodation for those people,” said Diener.

In a statement, officials from Triad National Security LLC, the federal contractor that runs the lab, said, “Triad values the contributions of all employees, and our decision to mandate the vaccine was made only after considerable thought.

“The safety and health of our employees remains our top priority as we fulfill our national security mission, and as a result, our vaccine mandate remains in effect. We appreciate the thorough review and consideration provided by the court on the important issues presented at the hearing,” the statement continued.

Read More


COVID vaccine mandate lunacy: If you sneak into America from Canada or Mexico, you don’t need a vaccine but if traveling legally, you do

The longer the COVID-19 pandemic lasts, the more ridiculous those pushing for various mandates related to it look to rational, thinking people.

When Donald Trump was in office and touting his “Operation Warp Speed” program aimed at bringing the country COVID vaccines in record time, Democrats — including then-presidential contender Joe Biden and his running mate Kamala Harris — said they wouldn’t take a jab developed under his leadership because they didn’t trust him.

After he delivered three vaccines instead of just one — and again, we’re not vaccine fans here, but we are trying to illustrate a point — and then had his reelection stolen from him, Biden, Harris and virtually every other Democrat is now using the vaccines Trump gave them to become tyrants by imposing nonsensical mandates that are not about “science” but all about power.

They include, of course, vaccine mandates.

Read More


Archdiocese of Toronto announces strict vaccine mandate for clergy, employees, and volunteers

Archdiocese of Toronto announces strict vaccine mandate for clergy, employees, and volunteers

Cardinal Thomas Collins announced that those who fail to comply with the directive could face disciplinary action that includes termination.

Cardinal Thomas Collins announced that those who fail to comply with the directive could face disciplinary action that includes termination.

Cardinal Thomas Collins

LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here. 

TORONTO (LifeSiteNews) — Cardinal Thomas Collins and the Archdiocese of Toronto issued two memos to all employees and clergy on Friday informing them of a new mandate that will require everyone to be fully vaccinated or be subject to weekly testing. 

“Beginning on October 8, 2021, we will require that all clergy (bishops, priests, deacons) be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 or provide regular proof of a recent negative COVID-19 test result in order to perform their duties,” the memo reads.

“If an employee does not comply with this policy, or is found to have submitted fraudulent proof of vaccination, a fraudulent test result, a fraudulent summary, or fraudulent documentation in support of an accommodation request, they may be subject to discipline (which includes being placed on an unpaid leave of absence), up to and including termination of employment for just cause,” it continues.

The recent mandate also subjects volunteers and all lay employees to the same vaccination or testing requirements, including but not limited to parish staff, lectors, choir members, and ushers.

If a person opts for testing, the memo states that they will be forced to pay for the weekly testing out of pocket at a fee of “about $40/test.”

The memo claims that the archdiocese “will accommodate individuals who are unable to comply with this policy on the basis of a protected human rights ground to the extent required under human rights legislation.”

However, last month the Archdiocese of Toronto released another memo telling clergy they are not to sign any letters of religious exemption regarding the COVID-19 vaccines, despite its connection to abortion.

The injections, which all have connections to fetal cell lines that were sourced from aborted children, are a cause of moral apprehension for many faithful Catholics and high-ranking clergy alike.

Bishop Athanasius Schneider of Kazakhstan has gone as far as providing affidavits for any Catholics who want to oppose mandatory vaccinations on religious grounds.

Read More






As we have long feared, and as has already happened in other countries, COVID-19 vaccination requirements are being used to impose unrelated ID requirements.

There’s a difference between “unvaccinated” and “undocumented” — a difference that’s  gotten lost in some recent regulations and orders imposing “vaccination mandates”.

Case in point: the San Francisco Department of Public Health.

An order from the SFDPH  purports to require people entering indoor businesses or other indoor venues including anywhere food or beverages are served, gyms, and other “large indoor events”  to show “proof” of having been fully vaccinated against COVID-19.

But proof of vaccination is not what the order actually mandates. Its only real mandate is a an ID mandate, and in practice its effects would be felt primarily by undocumented people (including vaccinated but undocumented people) who don’t have or don’t choose to show ID, not by unvaccinated people.

Regardless of whether you’ve been vaccinated or whether you think other people should be vaccinated, the ID mandate hidden in this order, like similar ID mandates lurking in other “vaccination” regulations and directives, is a step backward for civil liberties. It is vulnerable to, and deserving of, Constitutional challenge.

Here’s what the SFDPH order would actually require:

The SFDPH order defines several acceptable forms of “proof” of vaccination including, among others, a paper vaccination card printed in blank by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and filled in by hand at a vaccination site, a photocopy of such a card, an image of such a card displayed on a smartphone, a QR code displayed on a smartphone, or “a written self-attestation of vaccination signed… under penalty of perjury.”

None of these, with the possible exception of a declaration under penalty of perjury, provides more than the flimsiest evidence that someone (not necessary the person presenting the card or paper copy or showing the image or QR code) was vaccinated. None of them provides “proof”.

Anyone could write anything on a blank CDC card, photocopy such a card, copy an image or QR code, create a QR code, borrow a smartphone on which an image or QR code is already stored, or edit such an image to fill in the blanks or change the name or other information.

The most secure of these forms of evidence, at least in terms of the risk taken by someone using it to support a false claim to have been vaccinated, would appear to be a self-certification under penalty of perjury. It’s not clear what law would be violated by changing the name in an image of a vaccination card. And whatever might be said — in seriousness or in jest — about the possible penalties for misuse of Photoshop, the penalties for perjury are probably quite a bit more serious than those for altering an image of a vaccination card.

But while the SFDPH order defines a self-certification as “proof” of having been vaccinated, Appendix B to the order defines a variety of venues and events for which a self-certification of having been vaccinated will not be accepted, but other trivially produced forms of evidence of having been vaccinated will be accepted.

There are other inexplicable quirks in which forms of evidence of vaccination are and aren’t acceptable under the SFDPH order.

The most “official” and widely-recognized record of vaccination is the International Certificate of Vaccination or Prophylaxis (“yellow book”), a longstanding global standard adopted by the World Health Organization (WHO) pursuant to international treaties. These can be used to record vaccinations against COVID-19, and in some countries including Germany they are the primary vaccination records being issued to individuals. In the US, WHO-standard blank “yellow books”  are issued by the CDC and distributed to health care providers and the public by the US Government Printing Office.

Read More


‘We are not their slaves’: Disney employees to protest forced vaccination

(LifeSiteNews) — Firefighters and nurses on Sunday will march in solidarity with Disney employees who oppose a jab requirement from the entertainment company.

All Disney employees must get jabbed, though unionized employees at Disney World have until October 22, while non-unionized have only until the end of September.

“After our first march through Disney World last week we heard from Firefighters Unions, Police officers, Healthcare workers, especially nurses who all expressed outrage that their employers are acting like they own the bodies of their employees,” organizer and cast member Nick Caturano said in an emailed statement to LifeSiteNews. “We are not their slaves. We have rights, and the most important right is the governance over our own bodies.”

Caturano, a Disney employee of 16 years, organized a protest with about 50 people last week in Orlando against the company’s jab mandate.

“About 50 Walt Disney World cast members protested Friday against the company’s vaccine mandate,” the Miami Herald reported. “Members held signs near Disney Springs reading ‘coercion is not consent’ and chanted, ‘My body, my choice.’”

Caturano runs a website called, where he provides more information about his objections, as well as resources for people who want to learn more about how to object to the jab requirement.

“I also hope to provide Disney & businesses the shade needed to change course before they essentially commit, what I feel, are crimes against humanity by obliterated freedoms of medical choice, informed consent, of conscience & right to provide for oneself & family,” Caturano wrote.

Many Americans remain concerned that the vaccines have not been sufficiently studied for negative effects given their accelerated clinical trials, and some harbor ethical reservations about the use of cells from aborted babies in their development. Still other simply consider them unnecessary given COVID-19’s high survivability among most groups, low risk of asymptomatic spread, and research indicating that post-infection natural immunity is equally protective against reinfection.

While Caturano himself initially remained open to the benefits of inoculation, he soon saw the issue a different way.

He said “pressure started to mount” and described the coercion as “cultic” laced “with self righteous overtones.”

Read More


Arizona sues Biden administration over COVID-19 vaccine mandate; other states expected to follow suit

(Natural News) Arizona has just become the first state in the nation to file a lawsuit against President Joe Biden’s extreme vaccine mandate aimed at American workers. The state’s attorney general, Mark Brnovich, filed the 15-page lawsuit on Tuesday.

In a tweet announcing the lawsuit, which calls the mandates “unconstitutional,” Brnovich said: “The federal government cannot force people to get the COVID-19 vaccine. The Biden Administration is once again flouting our laws and precedents to push their radical agenda. I’ve filed the first lawsuit in the nation against these unconstitutional mandates.”

One specific aspect of the mandate that the lawsuit takes aim at is its violation of the Equal Protection Act by showing favoritism toward illegal aliens and “contempt for actual U.S. citizens.” It reads: “[U]nauthorized aliens will not be subject to any vaccination requirements even when released directly into the United States (where most will remain), while roughly a hundred million U.S. citizens will be subject to unprecedented vaccination requirements.”

The lawsuit also cites a report showing that 30 percent of the migrants held in federal detention facilities refused the vaccine, while 18 percent of migrant families have tested positive for COVID-19 prior to being released by Border Patrol. Moreover, one fifth of unaccompanied minors entering the country have also tested positive for the virus.

It also points out that while those who enter the country illegally are not subjected to any sort of vaccine mandate, aliens who go through the proper legal channels to get work visas and enter the country lawfully will indeed be subject to a mandate if they are employed by a company with 100 or more workers. This makes it appear that illegal aliens are getting preferential treatment when it comes to health freedom.

Read More