Zach Vorhies reveals Google’s plan to ENSLAVE humanity

 Former Google senior engineer turned whistleblower Zach Vorhies exposed Google’s plan to enslave humanity in favor of artificial intelligence. He told the Health Ranger Mike Adams of this plan when he appeared in an episode of the Health Ranger Report on BrighteonTV. Vorhies added that Google is indeed complicit in a plot to bring down America.

Vorhies first gained prominence in 2019 when he resigned from the Big Tech company with a trove of internal documents in tow. He delivered more than 950 pages of these files to the Department of Justice and leaked them through Project Veritas. Vorhies said he leaked the internal documents “to inform the public about Google’s extensive censorship.”

Vorhies later wrote a book titled “Google Leaks: A Whistleblower’s Expose of Big Tech Censorship” alongside co-author and attorney Kent Heckenlively. The former Google employee wrote in the book about how the company’s censorship awakened him to “the coup that’s happening to humanity” and how his workplace seemed to play a role in it.

“Google seems to be in this colluder circle, the network of people … basically going from a really great libertarian organization to one that’s building the Ministry of Truth,” Vorhies said, borrowing a concept from George Orwell’s “1984.”

He told Adams how Google gaslighted and hid information from the public. Vorhies said: “They told investors that they were going to organize the world’s information to make it universally accessible. But as soon as the wrong president was democratically elected, they turned a full 180 and said ‘we have to start censoring fake news.’”

To this end, Google created the Machine Learning Fairness algorithm and implemented it in Google Search, Google News and YouTube. Vorhies explained that the algorithm was released for three reasons: To manipulate the information landscape, to take control of elections and to push America toward Google’s corporate values.

Vorhies experienced an attack of conscience upon finding out the algorithm’s true purpose. “When I found this out, I realized that I couldn’t live with myself, Mike. I couldn’t live with myself walking into work every single day knowing that … this same megacorporation was actively subverting America,” he told the Health Ranger. 

Read More


REPORT: US Postal Workers Exempt From Biden’s Federal Vax Mandate – But Private Businesses Face $14,000 Fine Per Violation

What kind of payoff did “The Big Guy” receive from the American Postal Workers Union (APWU) to grant USPS workers such a sweeping exemption?

Joe Biden on Thursday declared war on unvaccinated Americans during a press conference on his “6-pronged” approach to combat Covid-19.

Federal workers will be forced to take the Covid jab under Biden’s new order.

Additionally, businesses with 100+ employees will be forced to either test workers or prove they are vaccinated.

OSHA will fine businesses up to $14,000 per violation.

However, USPS workers are exempt from Biden’s new order.

Recall, APWU, one of the very powerful unions representing postal workers blasted Joe Biden in July: “While the APWU leadership continues to encourage postal workers to voluntarily get vaccinated, it is not the role of the federal government to mandate vaccinations for the employees we represent.”

According to a report by the Washington Post, USPS workers are EXEMPT even though they are required to be included in executive orders that apply to federal employees.

Via WaPo:

U.S. Postal Service workers were not included in Biden’s executive order requiring all federal employees to get vaccinated against the coronavirus, according to a White House official speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss not-yet-public portions of the president’s plan.

The postal workers would be strongly encouraged to comply with the mandate, the official said.

The move exempts a massive chunk of the federal workforce — 644,000 employees and growing as the agency ramps up seasonal hiring — that interacts daily with an equally large swath of the public.

Update: White House official now says USPS workers ARE part of the federal vaccine mandate under OSHA jurisdiction, though technically not under the executive order.


Fauci can’t give a ‘really firm answer’ on why Americans with natural immunity need vaccines

  1.  Dr. Anthony Fauci, the White House’s top adviser for the COVID-19 pandemic, told CNN on Thursday that he doesn’t have “a really firm answer” on the accuracy of a study that found natural immunity provides better protection against the virus than vaccines alone.
  2. During an interview on “Anderson Cooper 360,” CNN chief medical correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta asked Fauci about a study done in Israel that found natural immunity from previous COVID-19 infection conferred longer-lasting protection against the Delta variant of coronavirus than two shots of the Pfizer vaccine.
  3. “So, as we talk about vaccine mandates, I get calls all the time, people say, I’ve already had COVID, I’m protected. And now the study says maybe even more protected than the vaccine alone. Should they also get the vaccine? How do you make the case to them?” Gupta asked.”You know, that’s a really good point, Sanjay. I don’t have a really firm answer for you on that,” Fauci replied.
  5. “That’s something that we’re going to have to discuss regarding the durability of the response,” he continued. “The one thing that paper from Israel didn’t tell you is whether or not — as high as the protection is with natural infection — what’s the durability compared to the durability of a vaccine?”
  7. Fauci explained that it is possible that natural immunity from previous COVID-19 infection only provides temporary protection from viral infection.
  8. “So, I think that is something that we need to sit down and discuss seriously, because you very appropriately pointed out, it is an issue, and there could be an argument for saying what you said,” Fauci said.
  9. This answer is misleading. The Israeli researchers specifically addressed the durability of natural immunity compared to vaccine immunity, writing that their study demonstrated “natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant” than does the two-dose Pfizer vaccine.
  10. Previously, Fauci expressed great confidence that the mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna provide greater immune protection against all variants of COVID-19 than does natural immunity.
  11. “Vaccines, actually, at least with regard to SARS-CoV-2 [the coronavirus] can do better than nature,” Fauci said in May during a White House COVID-19 briefing. “Vaccination in people previously infected significantly boosts the immune response.”
  12. At the time, Fauci pointed to two peer-reviewed studies that supported his assertion.
  13. Health experts have stated that while natural immunity is good for individuals, it is a poor strategy for controlling a pandemic because it varies from person to person depending on several factors including age, health, and the strength of a person’s immune system.
  14. “What we’re learning is that the immunity that is generated for many people after recovering from COVID-19 is stronger than we thought. And that’s great news,” said Dr. Brandon Webb, an infectious diseases physician with Intermountain Healthcare who spoke to KTVX-TV about the Israeli study.
  15. “That natural immunity, it does appear to be stronger than the immunity that the vaccines are able to elicit in patients who have never had COVID,” Dr. Webb explained. But, he added, relying on natural immunity to offer widespread protection against COVID-19 is a “non-viable strategy.”
  16. “It would be catastrophic in terms of life loss, in terms of overwhelming healthcare systems, in terms of economic impact. There’s no question that just pulling off the brakes and allowing the virus to run its course through a community to generate natural immunity would be devastating,” he said.
  17. Webb pointed out that the Israeli study found that “patients who have natural immunity and are then vaccinated are in the best possible situation.”
  18. “For you out there who are making that personal decision, it’s actually a risk, personal risk versus personal benefit question,” he said. “I, as a physician, every medication that I prescribe has some risk and some benefit. And the vaccines are no different. I think it’s really important for those of you who are making those decisions to understand accurately what the risks are, and understand what the benefits are both to you and to the community.”
  19. “Like any other medication that I prescribed, there are some risks,” he explained. “For example, if you’ve had a Z-Pak, you may not know that the risk of having a fatal cardiac arrhythmia with a Z-Pak is very rare. But it’s two times higher than having temporary inflammation of the heart after having one of the mRNA vaccines. We don’t think about that, we take Z-Paks all the time. The risks of the vaccines are very real, we have excellent data from Israel, and from the vaccine safety data that the CDC is collecting. And I can say right now that after millions of doses administered, we have a good sense of what the adverse event rates are. And they’re very, very low.”
  20. President Joe Biden on Thursday announced a sweeping executive order that requires private businesses with more than 100 employees to require their workers to get vaccinated or submit to regular COVID-19 testing. Any employer who does not follow the order will be subject to fines as high as $14,000 per violation, White House officials said earlier this week.
  21. While Biden’s vaccine mandate does not account for natural protection at all, some employers have taken steps to consider natural immunity exceptions to their vaccine mandates. A hospital system in western Michigan, Spectrum Health, for example, will grant temporary exemptions from its employee vaccine mandate to any individual who has a positive PCR or antigen test for COVID-19 plus a positive antibody test from within the past three months, the Detroit News reported.
  22. Fauci told CNN he fully supports the president’s order and said that were he in charge, he actually would have gone farther than Biden by removing the testing option for workers.
  23. “I think the president is, you know, being somewhat moderate in his demand, if you want to call it that. And that there are some people who really don’t want to get vaccinated, but they don’t want to lose their job, you’ve got to give them an off lane. And the off lane is if you get tested frequently enough, and find out you’re positive, you won’t come to work, and you won’t infect other people. So, it really is somewhat of a compromise there,” Fauci said.
  24. “Myself, I would make it just vaccinate or not. But he was trying to be moderate in what his pronouncement was,” he added.

Read More


Man Disguises Self As Illegal Immigrant So Democrats Won’t Care That He’s Unvaccinated

SAN DIEGO, CA—According to sources, Democrats in Washington really want people to get vaccinated. When it comes to undocumented immigrants, however, Democrats don’t really seem to care as much. This led local man Damien Cooper to pose as an illegal immigrant so politicians won’t bother him about getting vaccinated all the time. 

“Hola,” said Cooper to reporters when asked about the situation. “Donde esta la biblioteca?” 

The reporters quickly surmised from Cooper’s fluent Spanish that he was a Mexican immigrant and it would be racist to question him further.

Cooper’s employer has also backed off after initially telling him he would lose his job if he didn’t get vaccinated. They have also switched to paying him under that table so he can collect his wages tax-free, without fear of being deported. 

Democrats who were polled on the issue of unvaccinated immigrants coming across the border revealed that 46% of them don’t actually think COVID is something to worry about. The other 54% of them don’t really care about the health of Mexican immigrants. 

“Hey—as long as it gets me out of being vaccinated, I’ll just keep dressing like this!” said Cooper. “Er, um, I mean… donde esta la biblioteca?” 

Read More


Members of Congress and Their Aides are Exempt From Biden’s Vax Mandate

Members of Congress and their aides are exempt from Joe Biden’s vaccine mandate for federal workers.

Since Joe Biden’s executive order applies to federal workers in the executive branch, members of congress and staffers in the legislative branch are exempt.

Newsweek reported:

President Joe Biden’s new vaccine mandates for federal employees don’t apply to members of Congress or those who work for Congress or the federal court system.

Biden issued two executive orders on Thursday requiring vaccination against COVID for federal workers and contractors who work for the federal government. He also asked the Department of Labor to issue an emergency order requiring businesses with more than 100 employees to ensure their workers are vaccinated or tested on a weekly basis.

However, Biden’s order on federal workers applies to employees of the executive branch. The House of Representatives and the Senate belong to the separate legislative branch, and the courts to the judicial branch of the federal government.

USPS workers are also getting special treatment.

USPS workers are part of the federal vaccine mandate under OSHA jurisdiction, though technically not under the executive order.


We All Saw It Coming. CNBC Homepage Today. Fauci: “Vaccinate The Children”

they are slowly pushing and pushing and testing your resistance
now they are comfortable with your lack of reactions to go after the most sacred : your children too.

Speaking to a U.K. audience at a lecture hosted by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine earlier this week, the U.S.′ top infectious disease expert discussed the significance of “long Covid,” the benefits of a move to a three-dose vaccination drive and why he believes it is important to vaccinate children.
Fauci said that while it was his opinion children should be vaccinated against Covid-19, he did not wish to cast any “dispersion” on decisions taken by U.K. authorities to date.
The U.K.’s official vaccine advisers have not recommended the shot for healthy 12 to 15-year-olds.

See also  Trudeau said today he won’t let “the mob” control his campaign
See also  UNBELIEVABLE SCENES coming from Bondi Beach in Sydney!



Medical organization criticizes mainstream media for ignoring effective early COVID-19 treatment options

A leading conservative medical and health freedom organization is criticizing mainstream media outlets in the United States for ignoring alternative, cheap, effective and early treatment options for Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19). This organization has accused media outlets of being in the pockets of Big Pharma.

The group in question is America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS). It is a non-partisan and not-for-profit organization that represents individuals from a range of medical disciplines. All of their members have practical experience with healthcare and medicine. The organization’s current goals involve the promotion of solutions to the COVID-19 pandemic.

These solutions include providing Americans with science-based information regarding the coronavirus and combating the COVID-19 pandemic using evidence-based solutions that do not compromise people’s Constitutional freedoms. The group wants these solutions to be available for all Americans who need them.

The group is also concerned about protecting physicians from potential government overreach and advocating for healthcare policies that protect the physician-patient relationship.

Also of note is the organization’s fight against media censorship of alternative and early treatment options for COVID-19 and the “medical cancel culture” of physicians that promote these treatments.

AFLDS criticizes mainstream media for not talking about alternative COVID-19 treatments

Recently, AFLDS published a statement in response to what it called “inaccurate” and “slanderous” reporting by mainstream media outlets Time Magazine and NBC News.

The AFLDS accused the government of taking a fatalist attitude toward the COVID-19 pandemic. “The government has contended that there is nothing that can be done other than masking to protect individuals from COVID-19,” wrote the organization.

“The human cost of that reckless and unscientific prescription has been massive,” wrote the AFLDS.

The organization continued by talking about several licensed physicians who have promoted the use of various combinations of early COVID-19 treatments including hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, antibiotics, zinc and other vitamins.

Unfortunately, AFLDS pointed out that these physicians and their “extremely impressive clinical results” with using these alternative treatments have not been covered faithfully by mainstream media outlets. The group laments this fact because these medicines are cheap and easily available, but the majority of Americans do not understand their effectiveness against COVID-19 because of “unprecedented media censorship.”

“Globally it is well known that early treatment works but this truth continues to be frantically suppressed by the dishonest American media,” continued the AFLDS. The group then proceeded to cite several examples. The statement read:

“In India the scientist who withheld this cheap, safe medicine from her people is now facing the death penalty. In Japan the Tokyo Medical Association urged all doctors to prescribe ivermectin. In China [hydroxychloroquine] has been recommended since March 2020.”

The AFLDS then highlighted the fact that mainstream media outlets have failed to report the more than 300 scientific studies that show using these early treatment options is very effective against COVID-19. Some of these studies were published in some of the country’s most prestigious medical journals, including the American Journal of Medicine and the American Journal of Therapeutics.

The organization further pointed out that it has been directly attacked by mainstream media outlets “as part of an ongoing, orchestrated effort.” The AFLDS alleges these media outlets are earning billions of dollars from pharmaceutical corporations and pandemic-related government advertising.

“AFLDS continues to encourage the public to remain calm,” concluded the organization in its statement. “COVID-19 has a very high survivability rate and with an increased effort to protect physician independence and patient choice, we will save even more lives.”

Read More


40% of Coronavirus Cases in Massachusetts are Vaccinated People

I hate to tell you I told you so, but I told you so: mRNA vaccines don’t protect you from the deadliest virus in history (/s), and this is proof:

NBC Boston:

Nearly 20,000 fully vaccinated Massachusetts residents have now tested positive for COVID-19 and more than 130 of them have died, according to the latest state data on breakthrough cases published Tuesday.


Breakthrough infections again accounted for about 40% of all cases reported in Massachusetts last week.


Experts also told the Globe the increase in breakthrough cases is attributable to diminishing immunity from the COVID-19 vaccines, emphasizing the need for booster shots in the coming months.

  1. The PCR test doesn’t mean anything, it’s completely irrelevant.
  2. A covid case doesn’t mean anything.
  3. Covid vaccines don’do anything, but you have to take more until “science” says stop (never).
  4. This hoax will never end.

43% of Europeans Under 30 are Skeptical About Government’s Motives in Handling of Pandemic

This is good news, I guess:

The Guardian:

Radically different experiences of the Covid-19 pandemic have created toxic geographical, generational and societal divides across Europe that could shape the continent’s politics for years to come, according to a study.

“Europe is today a continent of split experiences: stark divides have emerged that could be as serious as those of the eurozone debt crisis and the 2015 migration crisis,” said Mark Leonard, the director and co-founder of the ECFR and a co-author of the report.

That feeling has contributed to a surge in cynicism among young people about governments’ intentions in introducing Covid restrictions, the poll shows, with as many as 43% of under-30s saying they were sceptical of governments’ motives.


About 20% of respondents under 30 said coronavirus lockdowns were “an excuse to control the public”, while 23% felt they were about “creating an appearance of being in control”. By contrast, 71% of over-60s said they believed they were aimed at containing the spread of the virus.