A Texas public school administrator told teachers last week if they have a book on the Holocaust in their classroom, they should also offer a book with an “opposing” point of view.
NBC News reports Gina Peddy, the Carroll Independent School District’s executive director of curriculum and instruction, made the comment last week during a training session with teachers on what books they should allow in their classrooms.
The Carroll school district is located in Southlake, a suburban school district near Fort Worth.
The training was conducted only a few days following the school board’s decision to reprimand an elementary teacher after a parent complained the teacher had an anti-racism book in her classroom.
In an audio recording obtained by NBC News, Peddy reportedly said, “Just try to remember the concepts of House Bill 3979,” referring to a new Texas law that requires teachers to present multiple perspectives when discussing “widely debated and currently controversial” issues.
“And make sure that if you have a book on the Holocaust,” she continued, “that you have one that has an opposing, that has other perspectives.”
“How do you oppose the Holocaust?” one teacher said in response.
“Believe me,” Peddy said. “That’s come up.”
Carroll spokeswoman Karen Fitzgerald told NBC News the district is trying to help teachers comply with the new state law and an updated version that will go into effect in December, Texas Senate Bill 3.
“Our district recognizes that all Texas teachers are in a precarious position with the latest legal requirements,” Fitzgerald wrote, noting that the district’s interpretation of the new Texas law requires teachers to provide balanced perspectives not just during classroom instruction, but in the books that are available to students in class during free time.
“Our purpose is to support our teachers in ensuring they have all of the professional development, resources, and materials needed. Our district has not and will not mandate books be removed nor will we mandate that classroom libraries be unavailable,” she said.
Fitzgerald also said that teachers who are unsure about a specific book “should visit with their campus principal, campus team and curriculum coordinators about appropriate next steps.”
This statement drew a harsh response from Clay Robison, a spokesman for the Texas State Teachers Association. He told NBC News there’s nothing in the new law explicitly dealing with classroom libraries. Robison said the book guidelines at Carroll are an “overreaction” and a “misinterpretation” of the law. Three other Texas education policy experts also agreed with Robison, according to the network.
“We find it reprehensible for an educator to require a Holocaust denier to get equal treatment with the facts of history,” Robison said. “That’s absurd. It’s worse than absurd. And this law does not require it.”
Texas state Sen. Bryan Hughes, a Republican who wrote the law, also denied the measure requires teachers to furnish opposing views on what he called matters of “good and evil” or to get rid of books that offer only one perspective on the Holocaust.
“That’s not what the bill says,” Hughes explained. “I’m glad we can have this discussion to help elucidate what the bill says, because that’s not what the bill says.”
Dallas station WFAA-TV reported Carroll Superintendent Lane Ledbetter said in a statement Thursday night that the district continues to “work through implementation of HB3979” and that “we also understand this bill does not require an opposing viewpoint on historical facts.”
Both parents and teachers have responded to Peddy’s comments.
“Teachers are literally afraid that we’re going to be punished for having books in our classes,” one elementary school teacher told NBC News. “There are no children’s books that show the ‘opposing perspective’ of the Holocaust or the ‘opposing perspective’ of slavery. Are we supposed to get rid of all of the books on those subjects?”
The Dallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum also said in a statement that they are appalled and called on Texans to speak out against the requirement to “present ‘opposing views.’”