Supreme Court: Pfizer, Moderna et al. may own your genes once you’re injected with their lab-created mRNA, DNA

WASHINGTON, D.C. — This article is prefaced with a shout-out to the good Dr. Carrie Madej (maa-DAY).

She is one of thousands of doctors and scientists worldwide suddenly labeled “conspiracy theorists” and “disinformation” by mainstream and social media. Dr. Madej tells peer-reviewed truth about COVID-19 and experimental shots. She is still on Twitter and Facebook for now. Dr. Madej is also featured in a viral video warning people about experiment mRNA and viral vector shots.

She said in a recent interview with The New American:

“The Supreme Court ruled that if there is anything synthetic, not from nature, inside of our genome, then whoever owns the patent on those synthetic parts now owns part or all of you as a human. That means Bill and Melinda Gates, The Department of Defense, [and others] can literally own a human being. If this synthetic code is taken up into your genome, by law, you could be owned overnight.”

Dr. Madej told The COVID Blog via email that she learned about gene patenting from Dr. Craig Venter. He spoke about it during a world symposium presentation. All legitimate doctors and scientists welcome fact-checking and peer-review. Turns out Dr. Madej is onto something, and further affirms every reason not to volunteer for these experimental injections.

Man-made bacteria and genetically-modified mice are patentable

The case of Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980) is the first time the U.S. Supreme Court heard a patent case involving naturally-occurring processes and/or organisms. Dr. Ananda Mohan Chakrabarty invented a species of oil-eating bacteria while working at General Electric in 1971. His invention streamlined the process of cleaning up oil spills.

He filed a first-of-its-kind patent for the new genetically-modified bacteria species. The United Kingdom had already granted the patent. But the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office denied the patent because it determined the invention was a living organism. The U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (now the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) reversed the decision. It ruled that just because micro-organisms are alive doesn’t mean they cannot be patented.

The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, affirmed. It ruled, in part:

Living, man-made micro-organism is patentable subject matter as a “manufacture” or “composition of matter” within the meaning of the Patent Act of 1952. The fact that the organism sought to be patented is alive is no bar to patentability. 

The case paved the way for biotechnology companies and universities. The OncoMouse, patented by Harvard in 1988, was the first mammal ever patented. Harvard scientists genetically-modified mice to be predisposed to cancer (thus the “onco” prefix) so other scientists could study the disease.

Scientists have since created an entire discipline on “transgenic non-human mammals.” Of course there are serious ethical concerns. But the practice continue.

Patentability of human genes (mRNA and DNA)

The case that provides the blueprint for pharmaceutical companies claiming ownership of your genes is Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., 569 U.S. 576 (2013). This case originated from a Utah-based company called Myriad Genetics.

The company isolated the location and sequence of naturally-occurring genes called BRCA1 and BRCA2. Mutations in these genes positively correlate with predispositions to breast and ovarian cancers. Myriad filed patents on these genes in 1994 and 1995, respectively. The patents gave Myriad exclusive rights to cancer genetic testing that isolated natural DNA strands and created synthetic complementary DNA (cDNA) that resembled the original isolated strands.

The USPTO granted both patents in 1998. At least 2,000 other human genes had been patented through 2010, according to the New York State Bar. But the Myriad patents hindered other scientists from doing research on naturally-occurring BRCA1 and BRCA2, and thus hindered breast and ovarian cancer testing by other companies.

Supreme Court permits patentable cDNA

Several Plaintiffs, including Yale, Columbia, individual patients, and patient advocacy groups filed a lawsuit against Myriad and the University of Utah in May of 2009. The Plaintiffs argued that BRCA1 and BRCA2 are not patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 because they are naturally-occurring. Myriad argued that it isolated the sequences of the DNA and that the Patent Office had issued patents for other companies doing the same thing.

A long legal battle ensued that included two writs of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Federal Circuit twice affirmed that both isolated DNA and cDNA are patentable. Ultimately the Supreme Court ruled that only cDNA (synthetic DNA) is patentable. Isolated, natural DNA is not patentable. Breast and ovarian cancer screening got much cheaper after the ruling since Myriad no longer owned patents on naturally-occurring genes and thus the testing.

When it was all said and done, the Supreme Court invalidated five of Myriad’s 520 patent claims. Myriad sued competitors for marketing ovarian and breast cancers tests based on the two natural genes after the Supreme Court decision. Ambry Genetics won a case against Myriad in 2014. The company said via press release:

Myriad did not create or alter any of the genetic information encoded in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. The location and order of the nucleotides existed in nature before Myriad found them. As the Supreme Court made clear, neither naturally occurring compositions of matter, nor synthetically created compositions that are structurally identical to the naturally occurring compositions, are patent eligible.

Pfizer, Moderna, et al. and your genes

Yes, this article contains a lot of scientific and legal mumbo-jumbo. But in a nutshell, biotechnology companies can own living things if said things are genetically-modified and not naturally-occurring. No mouse is born in nature like the OncoMouse. It is thus patentable. Oil-eating bacteria come from genetic manipulation, thus patentable.

Notice how all these so-called doctors and scientists avoid pointing fingers at Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson et al. when someone dies within hours, days or weeks of receiving their shots. It’s almost as if said doctors and scientists are carefully navigating the trademark and patent landscape. They don’t want to trespass on someone else’s property, if you will. Moderna owns several mRNA patents. Doctors and hospitals wanting a piece of the mRNA pie cannot bite the hand that feeds them.

The synthetic mRNA of Pfizer and Moderna, along with the viral vector DNA delivery systems of Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca, change your genetic code, making you “genetically-modified.” Granted mainstream media say the foregoing is “conspiracy theory.” But Moderna Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks tells you straight up that 1) the shots change your genetic code and 2) the shots do not stop the spread of COVID-19. He says the Moderna shot is “hacking the software of life.”

Viral vectors do the same thing.

So do these companies “own you” once you get the shots? Well, they own mice and bacteria created with their inventions. Once you get these shots, you are no longer a “naturally-occurring” human being. Prosthetic limbs, breast implants, etc. are not “natural” per se. But they are removable and not part of what fundamentally makes you human. Gene therapy is irreversible. Do the math yourself.

Stay vigilant and protect your friends and loved ones.

COVID Legal USA is your partner in fight mandatory vaccines and other COVID mandates. Follow us on Telegram and Twitter. Read about white pine needles and order them here.


Johnson & Johnson: what you need to know about COVID-19 viral vector shots

SILVER SPRING, MARYLAND — The Food and Drug Administration authorized the Johnson & Johnson viral vector shot for emergency use in the United States on February 27. That means the JNJ-78436735 shot (also called Ad26.COV2.S) is authorized for use without going through formal FDA approval channels for new drugs. It is the third shot given emergency use authorization in the United States, after the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA shots.

Emergency use authorization has been used 347 times since the COVID-era began in 2020, according to Harvard Law School. The FDA issued a total of 38 emergency use authorizations for Zika, Ebola, MERS and Avian flu combined. JNJ-78436735, developed by Johnson & Johnson drug division Janssen Pharmaceuticals in Belgium, is currently in Phase III clinical trials. Studies are expected to last through 2023.

Mainstream media have centered narratives around the fact that the J&J viral vector shot requires only one dose. Both the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA shots require two doses spaced out several weeks. There’s also controversy surrounding the J&J shot that mainstream media are covering. A New York Catholic diocese is telling its parishioners not to take the J&J shot because it is derived from aborted fetuses.

There is a common misconception that the J&J shots are “traditional” vaccines made from weakened virus. This is false. The experimental Covaxin (India), Sinopharm BBIBP-CorV (China), and CoronaVac (China) shots are the closest to traditional vaccines of all the widely-used ones. J&J shots are experimental viral vectors. The long-term effects on humans are still unknown as clinical trials continue. The following is a summary of viral vector shots versus mRNA shots.

What is a vaccine?

The term “vaccine” is derived from the New Latin word vacca, which means “cow.” It also has origins from the old Latin term vaccīnus, which means “of or from cows.” The term was first used to describe inoculations that prevent diseases in the late 18th century.

British physician Edward Jenner heard a rumor that milkmaids who got cowpox were subsequently immune to smallpox. Jenner posited that it’s better for people to get non-lethal, but ugly cowpox (and the remnant scars) versus deadly variola major smallpox.

Cowpox clears up within two weeks, leaving only scars.
Variola major smallpox has a 30% death rate.

He tested the hypothesis by scraping a cowpox sore on a milkmaid and injecting the material into an eight-year-old boy. The boy got cowpox and recovered within a couple weeks. Jenner then injected the boy with live smallpox virus. He never got sick. Jenner successfully tested the hypothesis on 22 other people. He published the findings in 1798, called An Inquiry into the Causes and Effects of the Variolae Vaccinae. The latter two terms literally mean “pustules of cows.”

Smallpox was declared eradicated in 1979. But the term “vaccine” lives on, whether used correctly or otherwise.


Sky News Australia drops bomb on Fauci, calls him “incredibly stupid” for funding illegal gain-of-function coronavirus research in Wuhan

Sharri Markson of Sky News in Australia has dropped a major bomb on Tony Fauci and his contrived Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) plandemic narrative.

In a recent segment, Markson called out Fauci point-blank for funneling American taxpayer dollars to Wuhan, China, to conduct illegal gain-of-function research on coronaviruses.

Markson says that Fauci is “up to his neck” in crime, which “just shows how incredibly stupid” he is. Markson has been probing Fauci’s criminal activity for a while now, having uncovered that Fauci “had funded 60 projects at the Wuhan laboratory.”

“Then he wrote a paper where he said gain of function research was worth the risk of a pandemic, and that he had even funded coronavirus research in conjunction with the Chinese military,” Markson added.

Since the beginning of his tenure at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) back in 1984, Fauci has been complicit in funding “risky research” in China, including at the infamous Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), China’s only known level-four biosafety laboratory.

“He never mentioned that his agency was funding this, and he actually knew a whole lot about it,” Markson says about Fauci’s work over the past nearly 40 years that he has been employed in the federal government.

Markson put all of this together in a documentary called, “What Really Happened in Wuhan” that exposes Fauci for the criminal that he is. The documentary features interviews with both Mike Pompeo and President Donald Trump.

You can watch the segment with Markson below:

Fauci is guilty of committing crimes against humanity

When even a mainstream news outlet like Sky News is talking about Fauci’s treasonous criminal activity over the years, you know the guy is in some deep doo-doo. And it is only a matter of time before his chickens come home to roost.

They say that the bigger they are, the harder they fall. And many people that Fauci has a whole lot more falling to do before he gets what is coming to him, and what he deserves, for unleashing mass genocide all across the world with his coronavirus experiments.

There is simply no more denying that Fauci committed many crimes over the years by funneling American taxpayer dollars to China to develop deadly bioweapons. This is no longer a conspiracy theory: it is now conspiracy fact.

The sooner the mainstream media here in the United States admits to this, the sooner we can be done with this nightmare. It all starts with telling the truth, though. After that, we can start dealing with Fauci and the other criminals who have perpetrated these crimes against humanity time and time again throughout history.

“Fauci should be charged with developing a Biological Weapon of Mass Destruction,” wrote one commenter at Citizen Free Press. “This should qualify him for the death penalty. Don’t worry. He’ll defect to China before they charge him.”

Another noted that we should not forget about Bill Gates and George Soros, who are also complicit in unleashing bioweapons for the purpose of achieving depopulation while raking in obscene profits.

“Demonic psychopaths and powerful elitists are always only one step away from crimes against humanity, but what is particularly disturbing is that the once-respectable field of medical science has capitulated to the political whims of demonic psychos with ambitions and visions of political destiny: a Marxist and globalist ‘utopia,’” wrote another.

“Can you say Agenda 2030?”

Yet another commenter called the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) plandemic “Fauci’s very own globalist pandemic,” asking why the guy is still allowed to be running around wreaking havoc instead of occupying a maximum security prison, which is where he belongs.

To keep up with the latest news about Fauci and the other Branch Covidian criminals, visit

Sources for this article include:


JAB AND DIE: Public Health Scotland data reveals 80 percent of Covid deaths happen to VACCINATED individuals

A recent report by Public Health Scotland (PHS) finds that 80 percent of Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) fatalities occur in vaccinated individuals. The Sept. 8 report reveals that people partly and fully vaccinated still catch COVID-19 cases even though they are no longer tested for the virus. Critics claim PHS cleverly presents its data to conceal the reality that more COVID-19 cases come from those who get the shot.

The Sept. 8 report breaks down the number of COVID-19 fatalities based on age and vaccination status. However, PHS does not present coronavirus deaths on a weekly basis and instead includes fatalities from Dec. 29, 2020. This gives the impressions that vaccines work in preventing COVID-19 deaths and that most fatalities occur in the vaccinated.

However, comparing the Sept. 8 report and an earlier report by PHS from Aug. 18 paints a different picture. The Aug. 18 report shows that 3,077 unvaccinated individuals, 273 who have received at least one shot and 206 fully vaccinated individuals have died of COVID-19 from Dec. 29, 2020 to Aug. 5, 2021.

Meanwhile, the Sept. 8 report also starts counting from Dec. 29 until Aug. 26, 2020. It shows that 3,102 unvaccinated individuals, 279 partially vaccinated individuals and 298 fully vaccinated individuals who die of COVID-19. At first glance, the figures show that injecting the COVID-19 vaccine reduces the risk of death.

But subtracting the Sept. 8 report’s figures from those of its Aug. 18 counterpart reveal that more deaths have occurred in the fully vaccinated. Between Aug. 5 and Aug. 26 – 25 unvaccinated individualssix partly vaccinated individuals and 92 fully vaccinated individuals die as a result of COVID-19. Putting it into perspective, about 80 percent of people who get the shot die of COVID-19 compared to only 20 percent of those who do not.

Another PHS report from Sept. 1 tracks statistics from Dec. 29 up to Aug. 19. It shows that 3,096 unvaccinated individuals, 277 partly vaccinated individuals and 264 fully vaccinated individuals have passed away from COVID-19. Subtracting these numbers from the ones in the Sept. 8 reveals the same result – that more vaccinated people comprise the disease’s fatalities. Between Aug. 19 and Aug. 26, a total of 36 people who get the shot die of COVID-19 compared to only six unvaccinated people.

Vaccines are driving the recent waves of COVID-19 infections

Based on the PHS reports, the COVID-19 vaccines are ineffective in preventing infection or transmission. The figures also clearly show that the shots actually increase the risk of people being hospitalized or dying – contrary to what health authorities claim.

In the U.S., data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) show a higher number of daily COVID-19 deaths following the development of a vaccineNational File has examined CDC data from the first 10 days of September 2020 and September 2021. The two periods correspond to the second wave of COVID-19 before vaccines and fourth wave of COVID-19, with mass vaccination occurring in the latter.

From Sept. 1 to Sept. 10, 2020, daily COVID-19 deaths in the U.S. do not go beyond 960. However, data from Sept. 1 to Sept. 10, 2021 show that daily COVID-19 deaths reach as high as 1,860. Based on these findings, the COVID-19 vaccine causes an almost two-fold increase to the risk of dying from the disease it aims to address. (Related: CDC: Fourth wave of COVID – despite vaccines – worse than second wave.)

However, doctors in different countries more effectively describe the vaccines’ failure and uptick in COVID-19 cases. One doctor in Israel, a country using the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA vaccine on its population, shares the situation on the ground.

Dr. Kobi Haviv, the director of Herzog Hospital in Israel’s capital of Jerusalem, mentions that vaccinated Israelis comprise a huge majority of the COVID-19 patients being treated in the country. He tells Channel 13 News: “I understand that most of the patients are vaccinated, even ‘severe’ patients. We are opening more and more [COVID-19] wards.”

Haviv adds that vaccinated patients comprise 95 percent of the severe cases in hospitals. According to the physician, the breakthrough infections mean the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine is waning – which sets up a possible scenario for booster shots to become necessary. (Related: 95% of severe patients in Israeli hospitals are vaccinated, warns doctor.)

Findings by the Israeli Ministry of Health (MOH) appear to back up Haviv’s claims of the COVID-19 vaccine’s dwindling effectiveness. The ministry’s July 2021 report states that the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine’s effectiveness drops to 39 percent against the more infectious B16172 delta variant. It bases its findings on COVID-19 cases recorded from June 20 to July 17, during the delta variant’s spread throughout Israel.

In spite of the vaccine’s diminished protection, the MOH still insists that it is still 91 percent effective in preventing serious illness among individuals who receive two shots. But Haviv’s remarks tell a different story – with fully vaccinated people comprising almost all of the patients in Israeli medical facilities. “Eighty-five to 90 percent of hospitalizations are in fully vaccinated people,” he says. has more articles about how the COVID-19 vaccine increases the risk of dying from a bout of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Sources include: 1 [PDF] 2 [PDF] 3 [PDF]


After falsely claiming that covid vaccines are safe for pregnant women, NEJM issues correction admitting “no evidence”

Natural News Back in June, the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) published a bogus study claiming that Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” are perfectly “safe and effective” for pregnant women to take. A few months later, the NEJM was forced to issue a correction.

Entitled, “mRNA Covid-19 Vaccines in Pregnant Women,” the original study by Dr. Laura E. Riley, MD, made the claim that pregnant women should take Fauci Flu shots because “developmental and reproductive animal data from Moderna showed no safety concerns.”

Riley further contended that there is “no biologically plausible reason that the mRNA technology would be harmful in pregnancy,” even though the jabs have never been safety tested on expectant mothers – not even once.

This ridiculous fake science study was crafted in such a way as to sound as science-y as possible. The goal, of course, was to convince as many people as possible who read it to accept its false claims without even a second thought simply because it was published in the “reputable” NEJM.

It was later discovered, though, that Riley’s claims were based on lies, and that there is actually “no evidence,” according to a recent correction, that any of Donald “father of the vaccine” Trump’s “Operation Warp Speed” injections are either safe or effective in pregnant women.

“At the time of publication of preliminary findings in the Original Article related to this editorial, the number of spontaneous abortions was 104 and there was 1 stillbirth,” the correction reads.

“However, no proportion could be determined for the risk of spontaneous abortion among participants vaccinated before 20 weeks of gestation because follow-up information was not yet available for the majority of those persons.”

Covid vaccination is genocide

As it turns out, Riley did not even present the data she included correctly. In the fifth paragraph of page 2342 of the editorial, Riley misreported the number of registry participants who reported a completed pregnancy as well as the number of spontaneous abortions and stillbirths that occurred post-vaccination.

This is the type of thing we have come to expect from the conventional medical establishment, which has proven over the past several years that it will stop at nothing to force its plandemic agenda on the masses.

The apparent assumption is that so few people will actually look into the false claims made that the Branch Covidians will be able to advance their agenda with minimal pushback.

Steve Kirsch, founder of the Covid-19 Early Treatment Fund (CETF), tweeted about the correction, noting that it is too little, too late now that potentially thousands of pregnant women already got jabbed based on Riley’s false data or some other propaganda.

“Whoops,” Kirsh joked about Riley’s study falsely claiming that Covid-19 shots are safe and effective for pregnant women. “Took them months to respond to our group.”

“In short, the CDC has no basis to recommend the vaccine to pregnant women. Will lack of evidence make a difference in the CDC recommendation? Of course not. We’ll experiment on the public,” Kirsh added.

Kirsh also pointed out that another admission was made in the correction about how “a relatively small number of completed pregnancies” were included in the data, making it incomplete.

“Shimabukuro et al. acknowledge the limitations in their ability to draw conclusions about spontaneous abortions, congenital anomalies, and other potential rare neonatal outcomes,” he further quoted.

Another Twitter user added to the conversation by pointing out that not only were pregnant women excluded from the mRNA trials, but so were those with autoimmune disease or a compromised immune system.

“That was so wrong considering they said it was safe for all of us,” this person wrote.

Another noted that a 30-year-old pregnant woman who took the jab experienced a large blood clot in between her uterus and amniotic sack just three days later. That clot was not present prior to the injection, suggesting it caused the clot.

Another thing worth noting is that Riley has glaring conflicts of interest in that she has accepted “personal fees” from drug giant GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). Riley lists these as “consult” (consultation) fees for the Moderna CMV (cytomegalovirus) vaccine.

Riley also takes in royalties “for parvovirus, rubella, herpes and varicella in pregnancy, as well as UTI,” according to the “relevant financial activities outside the submitted work” section of her ICMJE (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors) Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest.

Riley currently sits on the editorial board of the NEJM, by the way. This means that she holds sway over the other things that get published in the journal, calling into question its credibility as a reliable source for learning about the latest science.

Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) deception is everywhere, including in the medical journals. To keep up with the latest, visit

Sources for this article include:


Nearly 90% of young people in the UK already have antibodies for COVID-19, thanks to natural immunity

New figures suggest that nearly nine out of every 10 people in the United Kingdom between the ages of 16 and 24 already have antibodies to protect themselves against the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19).

These estimates come from the U.K.’s Office for National Statistics (ONS), which carried out blood tests on people between the ages of 16 and 24 in the country’s four main political subdivisions – Scotland, Wales, England and Northern Ireland.

According to the estimates, 86.9 percent of young people in Wales have COVID-19 antibodies. In Northern Ireland, the number is 87.2 percent. In Scotland and England, this number increases slightly to 88.7 percent.

The presence of coronavirus antibodies among such a high percentage of young people all over the U.K. suggests that many have already been infected by COVID-19 and have recovered from it. It takes two to three weeks after infection for the body to make enough antibodies to fight off the virus if it tries to enter a person’s body again.

The ONS also carried out blood tests on other age demographics. The government agency also found that artificial antibody levels among older age groups who were the first to get vaccinated in Dec. 2020 were falling very quickly.

The government agency also found that older age groups that have artificial “antibody” levels from being the first to get the COVID-19 vaccines in late 2020 and early 2021 were falling very rapidly.

The ONS and many British scientists even admitted that the so-called antibodies provided by the vaccines dip several weeks following injection, and they have also acknowledged that this means the supposed protection the inoculations give disappears over time.

Unfortunately, this data has not spurred on the British government to hold off on continuing the country’s unsuccessful mass vaccination program. Instead, government ministers are now pushing to provide booster doses to people over 50, people who are immunocompromised and healthcare workers.

The British government falsely believes that providing even more vaccines will help keep people from getting infected. (Related: Unvaccinated people have already achieved herd immunity, while the VACCINATED are now getting sick as their vaccines fail.)

If more people are not scared into getting vaccinated, the government is planning to coerce the British population by threatening to force people to wear masks in public and work from home. Worse yet, the government has not ruled out instituting another lockdown if the vaccination rate does not rise.

Many people around the world already have natural immunity to COVID-19

The U.K. is not the only country in the world with a high rate of natural immunity to COVID-19. In Mumbai, India, nearly 90 percent of the residents of the city already have COVID-19 antibodies, according to a survey that was just released on Friday.

The survey was conducted by the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation, the main civic body that governs Mumbai. The survey involved giving people blood serum tests between August and early September. This was done on 8,674 adult residents of Mumbai.

According to the results of the survey, 88.29 percent of women and 85.07 percent of men in Mumbai already have COVID-19 antibodies from natural immunity.

The survey also found that a slightly higher percentage of people living in crowded slum areas of Mumbai had COVID-19 antibodies. According to the survey, 87.02 percent of people in slum areas had COVID-19 antibodies, compared to 86.22 percent of people living in non-slum areas.

The previous survey conducted in March of this year found that around a third of the population of Mumbai already had natural immunity to COVID-19. The survey found that 41.6 percent of people in slums and 28.5 percent in non-slums already had COVID-19 antibodies.

Learn more about how natural immunity protects people from COVID-19 better than the supposed immunity provided by the vaccines by reading the latest articles at

Sources include:


Advocacy group threatens schools with legal action over COVID-19 vaccines administered without parental consent

Advocacy group Lawyers for Liberty has warned staff in schools across England that they could be held liable if they insist on vaccinating students against the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) without parental consent.

Lawyers for Liberty, a self-funded, voluntary network of lawyers, accepts referrals from parents concerned that their children will be injected with a COVID-19 vaccine without their consent. The group then emails the schools concerned, advising them of the “legal risks of their policy.”

Holy Cross Catholic High School and Parklands High School in Chorley, a town in Lancashire, England are two of many schools across the country that have been contacted by Lawyers for Liberty. But Steve Mitchell, headteacher of Parklands High School, said they have been assured by legal advisors that they will not be liable because parents have been informed of and have agreed to their vaccination program.

Mitchell also said they’ve had very few responses where parents said they did not consent to the program. However, he added that they’ve yet to ask for consent from students’ parents since they’re still waiting for further instructions from the vaccination team from the National Health Service (NHS).

According to Sajid Javid, the secretary of state for health and social care, the decision to vaccinate children had been taken following “expert advice” from the United Kingdom’s top scientists and vaccination experts.

Details about the government’s vaccination program for students have yet to be released, but it is expected that school staff won’t have a role in the program even though the vaccine will be offered in school settings.

One letter by Lawyers for Liberty, which has been sent to various schools, talked about parents’ right to exercise their parental responsibility during the decision-making process.

According to the letter, if a parent communicates that their child will not be included in the vaccination program or does not consent to have their child vaccinated, then that decision should be respected without any further consequences for the child, which may include direct or indirect discrimination and coercion.

Failure to respect that decision may lead to possible legal claims against both the school and its staff, according to the letter.

Parents’ concerns dismissed as misinformation

Geoff Barton, the general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), said many of their members have been receiving letters from Lawyers for Liberty and other groups threatening schools and colleges with legal action if they took part in the COVID-19 vaccination program for students.

Barton also said the letters were “extremely unhelpful” and asked that the groups behind them stop attempting to exert pressure on schools and colleges in the country.

Paul Whiteman, the general secretary of the trade union National Association of Head Teachers (NAHT), added that the letters were “misguided” and that the decision to vaccinate children was the government’s. (Related: Virginia bill would allow the state to vaccinate children without parental consent.)

However, he said that any parents with questions about important matters like consent should talk to the vaccination teams involved in the actual program.

Parents will still be asked to give their consent before their child is included in the program. But if a child doesn’t agree with their parents’ decision, the child will have the final say.

The Health Security Agency (UKHSA) has already said that it is aware that certain letters and emails with “misinformation” about the vaccine program have been circulating among schools and colleges.

The agency said headteachers who believe that advocacy groups might stage protests outside their school should contact local law enforcement to help manage the situation.

Follow for more news related to coronavirus vaccines.

Sources include:


65% of San Diego’s police force might quit due to covid vaccine mandate

When asked by the San Diego Police Officers Association (SDPOA) how they would respond to a Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine” mandate, member officers overwhelmingly indicated that they plan to quit their jobs.

An astounding 65 percent of San Diego police officers say they will up and leave if a Chinese Virus injection mandate is forced on them, while 45 percent, or nearly half, said they would just wait to be fired.

The SDPOA, by the way, has 1,971 members. This means that if these figures are correct, more than 1,200 police officers and administrative staff will soon be off the force, leaving San Diego vulnerable to whatever comes after its law enforcement apparatus has mostly disintegrated.

“If that half of the entire police department were to be fired for non-compliance with the vaccine mandate, the city of San Diego would be in a really sketchy place,” reports The Conservative Treehouse (TCT), citing the San Diego Union-Tribune. “The city has a deadline for compliance on November 2nd.”

When asked how they feel about a vaccine mandate in general for the force, 90 percent of officers in San Diego said they oppose them. This means that even those officers who choose to get jabbed themselves do not support forcing their coworkers to do the same against their will.

“We can imagine this same type of conversation is likely taking place in several cities and counties at the same time,” adds “Sundance” from the TCT.

“The police officers union was not present for the discussions with the Biden White House. The U.S. Postal Workers Union was present, and they were granted an exemption from the forced vaccine requirement.”

Only employed contributors to society are being punished with Biden’s jab mandates

Have you noticed yet that those being targeted most with Fauci Flu shot mandates are those who have gainful employment? This is especially true for those who work on the frontlines to maintain law and order (police), treat illness (health care workers), and keep your house from burning down (firefighters).

Everything that holds society together, in other words, is first on the chopping block for forced injection. Next are all the companies that employ 100 workers or more. Eventually, it will be everyone.

One silver lining is that many are resisting. All across the country, employed Americans including in key sectors are just saying no to both Trump Vaccines and Biden Boosters, even if it costs them their jobs.

This is a time for bravery and faith, it would seem. Making the tough decision to Just Say No to injectable drugs from the government and Big Pharma is certainly not easy, especially when you have a family to feed. If everyone does it together, though, then society can potentially put a stop to this madness.

Already, we are hearing stories of companies reversing their covid vaccine mandates because a bulk of their employees said they would quit or be fired. Recognizing that an exodus like this would kill a business, the executives in charge are backing off.

“In Seattle which lost 200 officers last year, 300 have refused to take the jab or release their private media accounts like email and blogs to the city and face being fired,” wrote a commenter at The Conservative Treehouse. “The number is 20% of the remaining force. Let it burn.”

“Election fraud put Joe Biden in the White House,” wrote another. “Joe Biden is not your medical doctor. The experimental vaccine will kill many.”

The latest news about how Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine” mandates are unraveling civil society as we know it can be found at

Sources for this article include:


Higher vaccination rates translate to higher covid cases as LEAKY, non-sterilizing vaccines worsen the plandemic

The most vaccinated regions around the world are suffering from a new spike in covid and associated illnesses. This new wave of sickness and death far exceeds previous waves of covid that were observed over the past two years. In the early days of the covid-19 lockdowns, case counts were extremely LOW in comparison to today’s numbers. After a second round of lockdowns and forced mask policies were implemented, case counts and hospitalizations climbed yet again in the fall and winter of 2020/2021, dwarfing the initial wave.

After mass vaccination campaigns were deployed across developed nations, case counts initially fell. During this time, fewer people were required to take the covid-19 test because they were considered “fully vaccinated” and protected from severe disease. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) had also stopped reporting covid in the vaccinated and even lowered the cycle threshold of the test, to strategically lower the covid case count in the vaccinated. However, as vaccinated people fell ill over 2021, covid testing ramped up and covid case counts and hospitalizations climbed yet again. Israel, the United Kingdom and the United States are now seeing their greatest surge in sickness since the plandemic began.

Leaky, non-sterilizing covid vaccines cause more sickness

Covid-19 case rates are increasing alongside vaccination rates, as artificial immunity wanes. The mRNA technology being deployed as “vaccination” is turning human cells into synthetic spike protein factories, forcing inflammatory auto-intoxication of the human body. These “vaccines” are a non- sterilizing intervention; the science puts selective pressure on the spike protein and drives new mutations in circulating coronaviruses. These leaky vaccines create vaccinated super spreaders, whose bodies are programmed to mass produce spike proteins that shed to others and harm the most vulnerable in a population. The vaccinated test subjects unknowingly colonize the virus and carry around high viral load as they become the asymptomatic super spreader that everyone was supposed to fear just a year and half ago.

Israel is the most shocking example of vaccine failure. Even with over 80 percent of their population “fully vaccinated,” herd immunity is still not realized. The nation is currently experiencing its fourth wave, and is responding to the crisis with more of the same – booster shots for all. Meanwhile, hospitalizations and deaths continue to mount.

The United Kingdom has successfully inoculated two thirds of its population, yet they are documenting another serious wave of covid.

Covid cases were a lot lower when everyone was unvaccinated

The United States is experiencing the same medical crisis. The Biden regime claims the country is suffering from a “pandemic of the unvaccinated,” yet a year ago, the covid case rate was approximately one fourth of what it is today. The case count was much lower when everyone was UNVACCINATED. There were 2.5 million cases per day by September of 2020, when no one was vaccinated. Today, the number of cases per day has reached 10 million, and that’s with 55 percent of the population “fully vaccinated,”  How will upcoming booster shots affect the covid case rates, hospitalizations and deaths?

Taking a closer look at the state of Washington, it becomes even more clear: vaccines are exacerbating covid case counts. As a matter of fact, the state has recently reached its highest case count – close to 5,000 per day. The most vulnerable population cohort (age 65 and up) are 89 percent fully vaccinated in Washington. Seventy-three percent of all people age 12 and up are fully vaccinated in Washington. However, the state is suffering its greatest covid wave yet.

In California, the case counts are rising along with the death rate, even though the state has some of the most tyrannical mask, lock down and vaccine policies in the nation. The seven-day average for covid deaths in September is higher in 2021, even though California has robust vaccine coverage. In 2020, covid cases and deaths were much lower even though everyone was unvaccinated. Something serious is going on in the U.S. and around the world. Predictably, these new vaccines appear to be vectors of disease, not public health solutions.

Keep up with the latest news and case numbers at

Sources include: [1] [2]


Americans losing faith in doctors amid widespread covid deception, fraud

More people than ever before are waking up to the scam of Western medicine, and we have the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) plandemic to thank for it.

An increasing number of Americans who used to trust the system are now saying to themselves, “I will never trust another doctor again.” Their reasons include the medical profession’s obvious shift away from science into a full-fledged death cult.

The covid agenda has really amplified this, showing that so-called “doctors” are now practicing medicine based on what the White House, Big Media and Big Pharma tell them to do. Science, meanwhile, has been tossed out the window.

“In private conversations with people they trust, American citizens are heaping contempt on doctors for forcing a narrative on us that had no basis in science,” writes Randi Pinkerton for American Thinker.

“Many of us, perhaps even the majority, immediately recognized this virus for what it is: a common flu virus maybe engineered to be more contagious if not more fatal but hardly differing substantially from other influenza strains.”

Deep down, most people, including those who on the surface seem to be buying into the plandemic hoax, probably know this. Since they foolishly went along with wearing a mask and getting jabbed, though, they are now too prideful and embarrassed to fess up to their mistake.

Some of them, however, are speaking up. Those who previously believed, or at least wanted to believe, what the television and social media were saying can now see that they were lied to – and they are not happy about it.

“It seems that our doctors went along with the hoax to a large degree because it put them in the spotlight,” Pinkerton further explains about why so many doctors went along with the ruse.

“Amazingly, almost none of them questioned the lies. They abandoned everything they’d learned in Virology 101 and went full ‘cry wolf.’ It worked out well for them. Suddenly, they were the focus of attention, and their words were hung on breathlessly.”

The chickens are coming home to roost for the plandemic deceivers

The honeymoon would not last forever, though. After basking in all that attention and loving it, these same doctors are finally starting to get some pushback even from their loyal followers who trusted them.

As more evidence continues to emerge showing that face masks are unsafe and ineffective, and that the same is true about the “vaccines,” those who fell for these ritualistic behaviors wants answers.

Why did the medical profession as a whole capitulate to these lies when it was obvious to many right from the beginning that plandemic “safety” protocols were all contrived? Why were hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and ivermectin restricted from being prescribed when they could have put a swift end to the lockdowns and other restrictions?

Every person who comes to the realization that he or she was lied to by what was supposed to be a “trusted” profession, medicine, now wants to know why “do no harm” was completely done away with in favor of full-scale medical fascism? And what happened to my body, my choice?

“Does the medical community understand that it has sacrificed the trust of Americans, possibly forever?” Pinkerton asks. “Does it even acknowledge the self-inflicted wounds that will now affect the relationship between doctors and their patients going forward?”

“How do doctors and nurses reclaim the trust of patients? Is that even possible now? Because in the cold light of day, it looks as if they were either stupid or malevolent. Given that they’re supposed to be educated people, malevolent appears to be the more likely.”

The latest news about public backlash against Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) tyranny can be found at

Sources for this article include: